Affirmative Action:  Clark is a strong proponent and supporter of affirmative action, diversity, and multiculturalism:

• �I�m in favor of the principle of affirmative action� what you can�t have is you can�t have a society in which we�re not acknowledging that there is a problem in this society with racial discrimination.�  Meet The Press
• "I saw first hand the racial prejudice, the civil disobedience, the intolerance� I've often gone back to that experience. It's something I've related to."  Waging Modern War by Wesley Clark
• Clark was recently one of several former military men to file a pro-affirmative action "friend of the court" brief on behalf of the University of Michigan in their battle against the Bush Administration efforts to dismantle Michigan's admissions policy. Clark said he was "surprised and dismayed" by the president's decision.  (Read the consolidated brief (PDF) of retired military leaders (including Wesley Clark) in support of University of Michigan's affirmative action program.)
   

The Environment: Environmental protections appear to be part of Clark�s overall global and progressive vision for America. 

• "Human beings do affect the environment and all you have to do is fly along the Andes and look at the disappearing glaciers down there and you recognize that there is something called global warming and it's just getting started as China and India modernize." (source � speech at the Council on Foreign Relations)
• "100 years out, the only things we leave behind that will matter are the environment and constitutional legitimacy."
   

Guns: Clark has implied that gun ownership is mostly a local issue. 
 

Health Care and Education: Clark is a strong supporter of a social safety net, including effective and well-supported systems of education and health care:

• "I grew up in an armed forces that treated everyone as a valued member of the team. Everyone got healthcare, and the army cared about the education of everyone's family members. It wasn't the attitude that you find in some places, where people are fending for themselves and the safety net doesn't work." (Source: Waging Modern War)
   

National Security, 9/11, and The Patriot Act: Clark is wary of trading off individual rights that allow the government to escape accountability.  Clark supports a review of the Patriot Act to assess its effectiveness and potential damage to individual rights.  He has also called for more accountability surrounding 9/11 so we know what went wrong and how to prevent these attacks in the future.

• �I think one of the risks you have in this operation is that you�re giving up some of the essentials of what it is in America to have justice, liberty and the rule of law. I think you�ve got to be very, very careful when you abridge those rights to prosecute the war on terrorists. So I think that needs to be carefully looked at.�  Meet The Press
• "One of the things about the war on terror that I am disturbed about is that we've essentially suspended habeas corpus. Which is something that's only been done once in American history and then only for a very brief period. When I go back and think about the atmosphere in which the PATRIOT Act was passed, it begs for a reconsideration and review.�  (source � Salon.com interview)
•  ï¿½We�ve got a set of hearings that need to be conducted to look at what happened that caused 9/11. That really hasn�t been done yet. You know, a basic principle of military operations is you conduct an after-action review. When the action�s over you bring people together. The commander, the subordinates, the staff members. You ask yourself what happened, why, and how do we fix it the next time? As far as I know, this has never been done about the essential failure at 9/11. Then moving beyond that, it needs to be looked at in terms of the whole intelligence effort and how it�s connected to the policy effort. And these are matters that probably cannot be aired fully in public but I think that the American people and their representatives have to be involved in this. This is essential in terms of the legitimacy and trust in our elected leadership and our way of government.�  Meet The Press
   

Taxes and the Economy: Clark favors a responsible and progressive taxation system that creates jobs and doesn�t put this country into ruinous financial shape with gaping deficits.  Clark, who at one point taught economics at West Point, was against Bush�s tax changes because they don�t effectively create jobs, they are unfair, and they imperil our nation�s fiscal health. 

• �Taxes are something that you want to have as little of as possible, but you need as much revenue as necessary to meet people�s needs for services.�  Meet The Press
• �[The Bush tax changes] were not efficient in terms of stimulating the kind of demand we need to move the economy back into a recovery mode, a strong recovery and a recovery that provides jobs.� Meet The Press
• �The tax cuts weren�t fair� the people that need the money and deserve the money are the people who are paying less, not the people who are paying more. I thought this country was founded on a principle of progressive taxation. In other words, it�s not only that the more you make, the more you give, but proportionately more because when you don�t have very much money, you need to spend it on the necessities of life. When you have more money, you have room for the luxuries and you should�one of the luxuries and one of the privileges we enjoy is living in this great country.� Meet The Press
• �I mean, you look at the long-run health of the country and the size of the deficit that we�ve incurred and a substantial part of that deficit is result of the tax cuts. You have to ask: �Is this wise, long-run policy?� I think the answer is no.�  Meet The Press
   

Women�s Issues: Clark is a strong supporter of women�s rights.  He is pro-choice, supporting the rights of women to make these decisions outside of governmental regulation (Source � The American Prospect), and in the early 1980s, he proactively tackled spousal abuse as an army commander with a forward-thinking assessment of the demands of the modern family. (source - War in a Time of Peace, by David Halberstam)